The early 1990s had people certain about one thing regarding the expansion of the Universe: Once it gained enough energy density, the expansion would stop and the universe would recollapse / The energy density would drop to a minimum value, such that gravity would superrule it and cause contraction of the system due to attraction. Great! “What’s the issue?” one would ask. Well, this was just a theoretical explanation. But the things turned out to be weird after the Hubble was sent up in 1998 and its observations recorded.

Observations of very distant supernovae showed that the universe was actually expanding much slowly, a long time ago, than now. So, the expansion of the universe had  not been slowing down due to gravity as everyone had predicted, but instead accelerated over time. No explanation could be given for this, but we knew that something was causing it.

Soon, three theories were developed to explain the observations:

  • It might have been a result of the long-discarded version of Einstein’s theory of gravity- the one which contained what was called the “cosmological constant”
  • There might have been a strange kind of energy fluid that filled space.
  • Or, the present ‘Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation’ was wrong and needed to include a field that caused cosmic acceleration.

More is unknown about dark matter and dark energy than is known. We can only calculate how much dark energy is present in the universe on the basis of how it affects universe’s expansion. So, it turns out there is roughly 68% Dark Energy, 27% Dark Matter, and the rest, less than 5% of the observable matter that we see on earth.

Albert Einstein was the first person ever to realize that ’empty space’ did not mean ‘nothing’. The first property he discovered was that, more space can come into existence. The cosmological constant containing theory by Einstein makes another prediction, viz. “empty space” can possess its own energy. Moreover, it would never fade or get diluted, as it was a property of space itself. So, as space came into existence, so did the new energy associated with it. But, no one could understand the reason for a cosmological constant to even be present, and if at all, be in the proportion it is, to cause acceleration of expansion of the universe.

Another theory states that the space might have been filled with particles that continually form and disappear. Unfortunately, when calculated by physicists, the energy it would give empty space, the answer came out to be 10120 times too big! That is a lot of error, indeed!

The second theory states that empty space has dynamical energy fluid. Theorists refer to it as ‘quintessence’. But if that’s what we are looking for, we anyway do not know what quintessence is like, what it reacts wit, et cetera.

Lastly, some theorists say Einstein’s Gravitation Theory is wrong. But then, what theory will it be, that describes all the things correctly explained by Einstein, like movement of planets in solar system, clustering of galaxies, etc. as well as the Dark energy phenomena. There are candidate theories, none compelling enough, whatsoever.

To jump to a conclusion, we need more, better data.

Dark matter, on the other hand, is a much more “unknown” topic than Dark energy. We are very certain of what dark matter is NOT, rather than knowing what it is! Here’s what we have on Dark Matter:

  • Firstly, it is dark, hence NOT in the form of stars and planets.
  • Second, it is NOT in form of dark clouds of normal matter/matter made of particles called baryons. We can be certain of this, as dark matter doesn’t show absorption of radiation.
  • Third, dark matter does not release gamma rays that is done by antimatter on  annihilation with matter. Hence, it is NOT Antimatter.
  • Next, it can NOT be galaxy sized black holes, on the basis of gravitational lenses we see.

All these points considered, we still have candidates for what can be Dark Matter. For example, Baryonic matter can behave as dark matter if it were all tied up in brown dwarfs or in small, dense chunks of heavy elements. However, the most common view is that dark matter is not baryonic matter at all, but something much more exotic like axions and WIMPS (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles).



  1. An alternative idea:
    Dark Energy exists but could have a lot higher energy density. (Casimir Effect experiments suggest a minimun of 12 orders of magnitud higher vacuum energy density if the distance between the sphere and the plate could get logarithmically half way closer to plank scales). That density gets gradually higher the closer it is arround cosmic structures when compared to the energy density at an orbiting star frame of reference due to gravitational time dilation (Galactic Shapiro delay inside a sphere with the star orbiting radius). The net effect is the accumulation of relativistic equivalent mass (Dark Matter). Since this explanation is purely relativistic, this hypothesis could explain why there are big discrepancies between Dark Matter measurents from gravitational lensing and rotation velocities, why dwarf galaxies seem to be sumerged on seas of DM, why there is not sensible higher CDM densities when calculated from inner orbiting star velocities. The mathematical model is far from perfect but exposes a mechanism that has been overlooked because relativistic speeds are a lot higher than any possible escape velocity (not counting arround black holes). There could be that the reason why the vacuum energy density calculated from expansion is too low is because Dark Energy’s nature is completely different to any other form of energy we are familiar with.
    Would these possibilities make any sense?
    Gravitational Time Dilation Explains Dark Matter

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s